Rock Art Research

Vol. 24 No. 1 (2007)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.56801/rar.v24i1.3
Published : May 15, 2007

ANTIQUITY AND AUTHORSHIP OF THE CHAUVET ROCK ART

Robert G. Bednarik (1)

(1) Caulfield South, Australia
Fulltext View | Download
Abstract

The veracity of the carbon isotope dating attempts relating to the rock art in Chauvet Cave is reviewed, together with the merits of their criticisms. The attribution of the cave art to the Aurignacian is validated by several factors and stylistic objections are refuted. The question of the ethnicity of the Aurignacian artists is also considered, leading to the cognisance that they are very unlikely to have been ‘anatomically modern’ humans. There is currently no sound evidence that the ‘Aurignacians’ were not robust Homo sapiens people, i.e. Neanderthals or their descendants. The gracilisation humans experienced in the Final Pleistocene and Holocene is attributed not to evolutionary processes, but to cultural intervention through breeding preferences leading to the neotenous features characterising present-day humans.